Skip to content
Skayle Marketing

Agriculture & Food Production

Marketing for agribusiness, equipment dealers and growers

Nothing here is bought when it happens to be convenient. Inputs go in the ground on a date the weather picks, machines are replaced out of a harvest that has already been banked, and a dealer territory decides who gets the call. These pages are written for businesses working to that clock.

Book a Strategy CallSee how we work

The category

What these businesses have in common

Agriculture is not a slow sector. It is a sector with very short windows, and the distinction matters because most marketing plans written for it are paced for a market where somebody might buy on any given Tuesday.

The second thing outsiders get wrong is who is in the room. Between the company that made the product and the person using it there is usually a dealer, an agronomist or a co-operative holding a territory and an opinion, and a plan that ignores them has planned around the people who actually sell.

Shared ground

What holds true across the sector

  • The calendar belongs to the crop rather than to the company. Planting, spraying, harvest and the settlement that follows set every buying window in the sector, and a plan built on even quarterly spend puts most of the money in front of people who are out in a field.
  • Capital items are replaced on a cycle measured in years and paid for out of a season that has already happened. The purchase is both considered and abrupt: months of quiet research, then a decision made in the fortnight after the income is known.
  • Almost everything reaches the farm through somebody else. Dealers, distributors, co-operatives and independent agronomists sit between the maker and the grower, and their territories are contractual, which turns marketing geography into a legal question as much as a commercial one.
  • Trust is built in person and then checked online. Field days, shows, demo plots and the local rep carry the relationship, but the supplier gets looked up afterwards, and a thin website quietly undoes a good conversation.
  • Downtime creates the most urgent demand in the sector. A machine that stops during harvest produces search behaviour closer to an emergency call-out than to a capital purchase, and what the buyer is checking is parts availability and how fast someone can get there.
  • Rural connectivity is a design constraint rather than an excuse. A heavy page built on the assumption of a city signal loses the visitor standing in the place the product is used.

Where they split

And where a single strategy stops working

These differences are the reason the pages below are written separately rather than as one page with the business type swapped out.

  • Inputs and iron are separate businesses on the same farm. Seed, fertiliser and crop protection are recurring, agronomically argued and often sold by an adviser; machinery is a financed capital purchase with a trade-in, a used market and a long service tail. One content plan cannot serve both.
  • Selling to growers and selling to eaters have almost nothing in common. A farm-to-consumer brand is running an ecommerce and provenance business, while the operation behind it is a production business, and those two need separate sites more often than a shared one.
  • Agricultural technology behaves like software with an agronomist in the middle. Subscription pricing, onboarding, data ownership and whether it talks to the machinery already in the shed decide adoption, and the buyer wants evidence from a farm like theirs rather than a product tour.
  • A co-operative markets inward. Its members already own it and buy from it, so the work is participation, retention and patronage rather than acquisition, and a campaign designed to win new business misreads the relationship entirely.

Related

Where to go next

Last updated · Reviewed by Zubair Afzal

We use analytics to understand which pages are useful. Nothing runs until you choose, and we do not sell or share what we collect. What we would set.